My Blog!

  I have always lived under the philosophy that anyone can write.   Since I was young, while writing stories with largely copied plots from my favorite movies, I have been in love writing.  It is an art. It was always my art, and I soon came to the realization that art is wholly subjective. Writing is wholly subjective.   Meaning, there is not one way to write.  Image source I find there is a certain elitist ideology that permeates through writing, and when discovering about writers like Dryden and Addison, this idea of elitism remains true. However, it is not secluded to this one specific era in the 18 th century or these two men. The idea of elitism in writing has been passed down through generations. It remains true in modern day academia and sometimes narrative writing. It is the idea that there is only one  correct  way to write. It is the idea that other forms or methods of writing are simply false because a group of elitists deem them so. Here’s the thing: writing comes in seemi

  The beauty of journalism is everlasting.     As an aspiring journalist, I think the most important aspect of a democracy is the freedom of press. The very essence of journalism is to inform the public, and that is something that has been prominent from the 18 th century to now.    Take Spectator No. 62 as an example, Addison informs the public of the difference between true wit and false wit. This aspect of journalism will always remain the same. Informing the public is the most important aspect of journalism.  Let’s talk about the entertaining aspect of journalism. At its core, journalism must appeal to readers. Without readers, journalism would serve no purpose. Both Steele and Addison did this in the Spectator. While newsworthy qualities are the most important, proper turn of phrase in order to best entertain the reader also matters. Although, we must keep in mind journalism's only function is not to entertain us. It is to inform us, but the two aspects can be melded together